Stance Classification in Online Debates by Recognizing Users' Intentions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Online debate forums provide a rich collection of differing opinions on various topics. In dual-sided debates, users present their opinions or judge other’s opinions to support their stance. In this paper, we examine the use of users’ intentions and debate structure for stance classification of the debate posts. We propose a domain independent approach to capture users’ intent at sentence level using its dependency parse and sentiWordNet and to build the intention structure of the post to identify its stance. To aid the task of classification, we define the health of the debate structure and show that maximizing its value leads to better stance classification accuracies.
منابع مشابه
Recognizing Stances in Online Debates
This paper presents an unsupervised opinion analysis method for debate-side classification, i.e., recognizing which stance a person is taking in an online debate. In order to handle the complexities of this genre, we mine the web to learn associations that are indicative of opinion stances in debates. We combine this knowledge with discourse information, and formulate the debate side classifica...
متن کاملWhy are You Taking this Stance? Identifying and Classifying Reasons in Ideological Debates
Recent years have seen a surge of interest in stance classification in online debates. Oftentimes, however, it is important to determine not only the stance expressed by an author in her debate posts, but also the reasons behind her supporting or opposing the issue under debate. We therefore examine the new task of reason classification in this paper. Given the close interplay between stance cl...
متن کاملStance Classification of Ideological Debates: Data, Models, Features, and Constraints
Determining the stance expressed in a post written for a two-sided debate in an online debate forum is a relatively new and challenging problem in opinion mining. We seek to gain a better understanding of how to improve machine learning approaches to stance classification of ideological debates, specifically by examining how the performance of a learning-based stance classification system varie...
متن کاملExtra-Linguistic Constraints on Stance Recognition in Ideological Debates
Determining the stance expressed by an author from a post written for a twosided debate in an online debate forum is a relatively new problem. We seek to improve Anand et al.’s (2011) approach to debate stance classification by modeling two types of soft extra-linguistic constraints on the stance labels of debate posts, user-interaction constraints and ideology constraints. Experimental results...
متن کاملWeakly Supervised Tweet Stance Classification by Relational Bootstrapping
Supervised stance classification, in such domains as Congressional debates and online forums, has been a topic of interest in the past decade. Approaches have evolved from text classification to structured output prediction, including collective classification and sequence labeling. In this work, we investigate collective classification of stances on Twitter, using hinge-loss Markov random fiel...
متن کامل